AccessibilityScanner

ACCESSIBILITY SOLUTION COMPARISON

Find the right accessibility solution for your website

Compare platforms for monitoring, remediation, expert audits, and ongoing accessibility work - without treating automation as a compliance guarantee.

Independent comparison: We may earn a commission from provider links, at no additional cost to you.How we compare solutions

QUICK SHORTLIST

Four approaches worth comparing

No automated product can guarantee legal compliance. Match the service model to your website, team, and risk.

Ongoing monitoring

AudioEye

A platform-oriented option focused on continuous monitoring, remediation workflows, and expert support.

Consider for: Organizations that need ongoing oversight across changing websites See comparison

Fast implementation

UserWay

Offers widget-led accessibility tools alongside monitoring, scanning, and broader platform services.

Consider for: Smaller teams looking for a relatively quick accessibility starting point See comparison

DETAILED COMPARISON

What each solution is built to do

1

Hybrid approach

EqualWeb

Automation

Combines automated accessibility technology with optional expert audits and remediation services.

Best considered by: Teams that want automation plus access to human accessibility expertise

Potential strengths

  • Automated and managed-service options
  • Manual audit and remediation support
  • Useful for organizations with broader compliance programs

Questions to ask

  • The right package may require a sales-led assessment
  • Confirm exactly which manual services and documentation are included
AutomationManual servicesMonitoringCompliance support
Visit EqualWebOpens the provider website
2

Ongoing monitoring

AudioEye

Monitoring

A platform-oriented option focused on continuous monitoring, remediation workflows, and expert support.

Best considered by: Organizations that need ongoing oversight across changing websites

Potential strengths

  • Continuous accessibility monitoring
  • Issue remediation and expert-service options
  • Suited to teams managing accessibility over time

Questions to ask

  • Scope and pricing vary by website and service level
  • Ask how automated findings, human review, and remediation responsibilities are divided
MonitoringTestingRemediation supportReporting
Visit AudioEyeOpens the provider website
3

Fast implementation

UserWay

Widget

Offers widget-led accessibility tools alongside monitoring, scanning, and broader platform services.

Best considered by: Smaller teams looking for a relatively quick accessibility starting point

Potential strengths

  • Straightforward website integration
  • User-facing accessibility controls
  • Additional scanning and monitoring products available

Questions to ask

  • A widget is not a substitute for source-code remediation or manual testing
  • Evaluate the complete platform rather than judging only the on-page widget
WidgetScanningMonitoringAccessibility controls
Visit UserWayOpens the provider website
4

Automation-first

accessiBe

Automation

Provides an automated accessibility layer as well as tools intended for developers and accessibility workflows.

Best considered by: Businesses specifically evaluating an automation-first approach

Potential strengths

  • Fast initial implementation
  • Automated interface and screen-reader adjustments
  • Developer-oriented accessibility tooling is also available

Questions to ask

  • Automation cannot establish complete legal or WCAG compliance by itself
  • Review independent testing, current product claims, and manual-audit requirements before buying
AutomationAccessibility interfaceDeveloper toolsScanning
Visit accessiBeOpens the provider website

BUYER CHECKLIST

Choose the service model before the vendor

Automation scope

Ask what the software detects, what it changes, and what still requires developers or manual testing.

Human review

Confirm whether disabled-user testing, keyboard testing, screen-reader review, and expert audits are included.

Documentation

Identify whether you need audit reports, an accessibility statement, VPAT support, or remediation records.

Ongoing ownership

Decide who monitors new pages and third-party code after the initial remediation work is complete.

OUR METHOD

How we organize this comparison

We compare publicly described product capabilities, implementation model, monitoring approach, availability of human services, and practical fit for different teams.

We do not treat widgets, overlays, or automated scans as proof of WCAG or legal compliance. Product capabilities and pricing change, so verify contract terms and request a manual accessibility assessment when legal risk is material.

NOT SURE WHAT YOU NEED?

Start with evidence from your own website

Run a free scan, review the highest-impact barriers, and use the findings to ask providers better questions.
Check my website